How Much Time Should I Give a Co-author Peer Review
Editorial and Peer Review Procedure
PLOS ONE is a peer reviewed scientific journal with a rigorous editorial screening and cess process made upward of several stages.
PLOS ONE considers original research articles from all disciplines within the journal's scope in the natural sciences, medical research, technology, likewise as the related social sciences and humanities. The editors make decisions on submissions based on scientific rigor, regardless of novelty.
| | Checking the status of your manuscript The corresponding author can bank check the condition of a submitted manuscript at anytime in our submission system. |
Agreement Manuscript Statuses
| Manuscript submitted | The journal has received the submission and is conducting an initial editorial cess and screening for technical requirements. |
| Editor invited | The periodical function is identifying potential editors to handle the submission. |
| With editor | The manuscript has been placed with a member of the editorial board for handling. |
| Under review | The handling editor has invited peer reviewers to evaluate the submission. |
| Required reviews complete | Some or all assigned reviewers have submitted comments. |
| Decision in process | The handling editor has drafted a decision, merely it has not yet been finalized or sent to the authors. |
Initial Checks
| | The journal staff and in-business firm editorial team perform an initial quality check to place potential problems such as:
Submissions may be returned to authors for changes or clarifications at this stage. |
Editorial Review
| | After completing internal checks, each new submission is assigned to an Bookish Editor with relevant expertise. The editor reviews the manuscript against our publication criteria and determines whether reviews from additional experts are needed to evaluate the manuscript. The handling Academic Editor is usually a fellow member of the PLOS One Editorial Board, but occasionally a Guest Editor is invited to serve instead. |
Peer Review
| | During the submission process you'll be asked to indicate any specific editors or reviewers who should not review your manuscript. We will respect your asking so long as it does not interfere with the objective and thorough cess of the submission. The treatment editor selects reviewers based on expertise, publication history, and past reviews, and invites them to provide feedback on the manuscript. Afterwards like-minded to review, external peer reviewers typically accept 10 days to submit their review. The journal function will follow upward with late reviewers and keep you informed if at that place are any delays. PLOS Ane uses single blind peer review. Reviewers remain anonymous unless they choose to identify themselves past signing their name to their review in our submission arrangement. |
Editorial Decisions
| | The handling Academic Editor or staff editor makes the concluding decision on each manuscript. The time to render a first determination averages virtually 43 days, but times vary depending on how long information technology takes for the editor to receive and assess reviews. The editor considers reviewer feedback and their own evaluation of the manuscript in order to reach a decision. The following decision types are available:
Decisions are communicated to the corresponding author in a formal alphabetic character, along with reviewer feedback and whatever other requirements from the journal role. |
Revisions
| | If the editor feels that your manuscript has the potential to be published, but requires changes, you'll be invited to revise it. You'll take 45 days to resubmit the revised manuscript for both a major or a small revision. In most cases, the revised manuscript is re-assigned to the original Academic Editor. The editor may make a new decision based on their own assessment of the revised manuscript and your response to reviewers, or request boosted input from external peer reviewers. Read more about revising your manuscript. |
Accepted Manuscripts
| | PLOS 1 uses two levels of accept determination. When the handling editor is satisfied with the scientific aspects of the manuscript they'll upshot an editorial have decision. This is a provisional acceptance, pending terminal checks for formatting and technical requirements. Once the final requirements are fulfilled, the journal role will ship a formal take decision, and your manuscript will move on to production. Read more than about accustomed manuscripts. |
Peer Review History
| | PLOS now offers accepted authors the opportunity to publish the peer review history of their manuscript alongside the final commodity. The peer review history parcel includes the complete editorial conclusion letter for each revision, with reviews, and your responses to reviewer comments, including attachments. If the peer reviewers have chosen to sign their reviews, their names will also announced. If your submission is accepted for publication, y'all'll be invited to opt-in to publish the peer review history of your manuscript using a grade in our submission organization. Sharing peer review history enriches the scientific record, increases transparency and accountability, and helps to reinforce the validity of your research by displaying the thoroughness of the peer review process it has undergone. The journal reserves the right non to publish peer review history in special cases, for instance, due to an ethical consideration, such as the inclusion of information about a vulnerable population. |
Transferring to Other Journals
| | Authors can request that submissions (with reviewer reports, if relevant) rejected from one PLOS journal be transferred to another PLOS periodical for further consideration there. Manuscripts will never be transferred between the journals without an author's consent. We trust that reviewers for whatsoever PLOS journal are willing to take their reviews considered by the editors of another PLOS journal. In addition, PLOS ONEhas partnered with the Neuroscience Peer Review Consortium to help ensure that the time and expertise that reviewers devote to assessing a manuscript is non lost if authors make up one's mind to submit to another journal. As such, PLOS ONE may transmit reviews to other NPRC journals at the request of the authors. We volition contact private reviewers for permission to transmit their names to the recipient periodical and will otherwise transmit the reports anonymously. |
Appeals
| | Authors may submit a formal entreatment for rejected submissions. Appeal requests must exist fabricated in writing to plosone@plos.org with the word "appeal" in the subject line. Authors must provide detailed reasons for the appeal and point-by-point responses to the reviewers' and/or Academic Editor's comments. Decisions on appeals are final without exception. Priority is given to new submissions, so the entreatment process may take longer than the original submission process. |
Contact
If you lot accept questions at whatever phase in the procedure, please email us.
Source: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/editorial-and-peer-review-process